Thomas D. Schultz

791 citations
27 papers · 638 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Schultz

27 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 410
  • Insect Science 185
  • Genetics 292
  • Ecological Modeling 43
  • Ecology 217
Replace Samuel Zschokke with:
Samuel Zschokke Switzerland
Linden Higgins United States
Tamás Szűts Hungary
Hasan Hüseyin Başıbüyük Türkiye
John F. Barker Canada
N. P. Kristensen Denmark
Elysse M. Craddock United States
Srećko Ćurčić Serbia
Nivar Gobbi Brazil
Matjaž Gregorič Slovenia
Thomas D. Schultz relative to Samuel Zschokke Switzerland Samuel Zschokke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Samuel Zschokke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Schultz. The network helps show where Thomas D. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993107
2 200587
3 198560
4 198754
5 198941
6 198635
7 198732
8 198730
9 198926
10 199225
11 198523
12 199220
13 199019
14 198813
15 199011
16
Destructive effects of off-road vehicles on tiger beetle habitat in central Arizona
198810
17 19839
18 20107
19 19945
20 19795

About Thomas D. Schultz

Thomas D. Schultz is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Insect Science and Accounting, having authored 27 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (410 citations), Insect Science (185 citations), Genetics (292 citations), Ecological Modeling (43 citations) and Ecology (217 citations). Thomas D. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Neil F. Hadley, Mary Ann Rankin, C. Barry Knisley, Dennis R. Paulson, Ola M. Fincke, Rob DeSalle, Gary D. Bernard, Thorsten Aßmann, Alfried P. Vogler and Michael Quinlan. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Experimental Biology, The Auk, Oecologia and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact