Charles D. Wright
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Thomas N. Hall (4 shared papers)Mary Frances Wack (1 shared paper)Rory Naismith (1 shared paper)Mark Griffith (1 shared paper)Martin Camargo (1 shared paper)Andy Orchard (1 shared paper)Susan Pintzuk (1 shared paper)Donka Minkova (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anglo-Saxon England (3 papers)Notes and Queries (2 papers)Traditio (1 paper)Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie (1 paper)The Journal of English and Germanic Philology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Charles D. Wright
18 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Classics 180
- History 103
- Language and Linguistics 50
- Religious studies 19
- Anthropology 24
Countries citing papers authored by Charles D. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles D. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles D. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles D. Wright. The network helps show where Charles D. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Charles D. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 3 | Via crucis : essays on early medieval sources and ideas : in memory of J.E. Cross | 2002 | 28 |
| 4 | THE PLEDGE OF THE SOUL: A JUDGMENT THEME IN OLD ENGLISH HOMILETIC LITERATURE AND CYNEWULF'S "ELENE" | 1990 | 27 |
| 5 | Quarter Notes: Improvisations and Interviews | 1995 | 8 |
| 6 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | Theorizing prayer in Anglo-Saxon England: Bede and Ælfric | 2011 | 1 |
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 1 |
About Charles D. Wright
Charles D. Wright is a scholar working on Classics, History, Language and Linguistics, Religious studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 33 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (20 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (10 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (7 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (2 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (180 citations), History (103 citations), Language and Linguistics (50 citations), Religious studies (19 citations) and Anthropology (24 citations). Charles D. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Hall, Mary Frances Wack, Rory Naismith, Mark Griffith, Martin Camargo, Andy Orchard, Susan Pintzuk, Donka Minkova, Christopher M. Cain and Anatoly Liberman. Their work appears in journals such as Anglo-Saxon England, Notes and Queries, Traditio, Anglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie and The Journal of English and Germanic Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.