Thomas D. Bunch

2.8k citations
112 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Bunch

111 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas D. Bunch
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Reproductive Medicine 321
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 885
  • Genetics 662
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 229
  • Molecular Biology 880
Replace G.B. Anderson with:
G.B. Anderson United States
Douglas N. Foster United States
Bonnie S. Dunbar United States
Susanta K. Behura United States
Stefan Hiendleder Germany
S. M. Willadsen United States
Miguel Ángel Ramírez Spain
Jean‐Luc Gatti France
Karine Reynaud France
Terje Raudsepp United States
Thomas D. Bunch relative to G.B. Anderson United States G.B. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G.B. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Bunch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Bunch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Bunch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Bunch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Bunch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Bunch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Bunch. The network helps show where Thomas D. Bunch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Bunch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Bunch Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Bunch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003231
2 1995100
3 199987
4 199176
5 199073
6 201459
7 200458
8 200555
9 199742
10 200938
11 199037
12 199635
13 200834
14 200432
15 200632
16 199131
17 199631
18 199930
19 198030
20 200429

About Thomas D. Bunch

Thomas D. Bunch is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine and Plant Science, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (41 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (24 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (15 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (15 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (15 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (13 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (12 papers) and Renal and related cancers (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (321 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (885 citations), Genetics (662 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (229 citations) and Molecular Biology (880 citations). Thomas D. Bunch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth L. White, Kip E. Panter, Kenneth I. Aston, Guangpeng Li, Richard F. Keeler, W. C. Foote, William Reed, G.L. Woods, Dirk K. Vanderwall and Robert J. Callan. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Journal of Heredity, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Animal Reproduction Science and Reproduction Fertility and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact