Thomas Craig

19 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Thomas Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 149
  • Human-Computer Interaction 61
  • Clinical Psychology 177
  • Medical Terminology 2
Replace Cand Psychol with:
Cand Psychol United Kingdom
Caterina Novara Italy
Luigi Solano Italy
Cezar Giosan United States
Giulia Savarese Italy
Lindsay A. Bornheimer United States
Pamela Scorza United States
Osmano Oasi Italy
Nancy E. Edwards United States
Chelsey R. Wilks United States
Thomas Craig relative to Cand Psychol United Kingdom Cand Psychol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Cand Psychol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Craig. The network helps show where Thomas Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Craig Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017221
2 1982121
3 198472
4 199134
5 198330
6 198226
7 201522
8 198417
9 201816
10 20189
11 19738
12 20057
13 20177
14 19926
15
Automating the Treatment Planning Process: How? Why? For Whom?
19825
16 20082
17 20212
18 20182
19 19811
20
ENZYME LINKED IMMUNO TRANSFER BLOT ANALYSI OF EXCRETORY - CECRETORY PROTEINS OF FASIOLOIDES MAGNA & FASCIOLA HEPATICA
19951

About Thomas Craig

Thomas Craig is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 22 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (2 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (57 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (149 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (177 citations) and Medical Terminology (2 citations). Thomas Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Valmaggia, Philippa Anne Garety, Maria del Mar Rus Calafell, Matthew J. Edlund, Ann B. Goodman, Gary Haugland, Carole Siegel, David T Cowan, Tony Charman and Paul I. Clifford. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Veterinary Parasitology Regional Studies and Reports, Evidence-Based Mental Health and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact