Thomas Craig

16 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Thomas Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Applied Psychology 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 163
  • Human-Computer Interaction 52
  • Clinical Psychology 174
  • Philosophy 61
Replace Rachel Elvins with:
Rachel Elvins United Kingdom
Erik Bulten Netherlands
Devika Fiorillo United States
M. Manjula India
Cezar Giosan United States
Chelsey R. Wilks United States
Lindsay A. Bornheimer United States
Anita Lungu United States
Lina Gega United Kingdom
Mark Kenwright United Kingdom
Thomas Craig relative to Rachel Elvins United Kingdom Rachel Elvins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Rachel Elvins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Craig. The network helps show where Thomas Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Craig Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2017188
2 1982106
3 198448
4 199134
5 198330
6 198224
7 201520
8 198413
9 20188
10 19738
11 20057
12 20176
13
Automating the Treatment Planning Process: How? Why? For Whom?
19825
14 20182
15 20212
16
ENZYME LINKED IMMUNO TRANSFER BLOT ANALYSI OF EXCRETORY - CECRETORY PROTEINS OF FASIOLOIDES MAGNA & FASCIOLA HEPATICA
19951
17 19861
18 19811

About Thomas Craig

Thomas Craig is a scholar working on Surgery, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (1 paper), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (62 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (52 citations), Clinical Psychology (174 citations) and Philosophy (61 citations). Thomas Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Valmaggia, Mar Rus‐Calafell, Philippa Garety, Matthew J. Edlund, Ann B. Goodman, Carole Siegel, Gary Haugland, Lin Shang, Paul Clifford and Tony Charman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of the Intensive Care Society, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, British Journal of Clinical Psychology and Veterinary Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact