Thomas Corbeil

1k citations
31 papers · 824 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Corbeil

29 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Thomas Corbeil
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Clinical Psychology 358
  • Occupational Therapy 100
  • Social Psychology 109
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Health 22
Replace Philip L. Reed with:
Philip L. Reed United States
Louis Jehel France
Walter Busuttil United Kingdom
Stacey Callahan France
Juliette M. Mott United States
Patcho N. Santiago United States
María Dolores Braquehais Spain
Neil Kitchiner United Kingdom
Sarah Dorrington United Kingdom
Maria L. Pacella‐LaBarbara United States
Thomas Corbeil relative to Philip L. Reed United States Philip L. Reed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Philip L. Reed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Corbeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Corbeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Corbeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Corbeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Corbeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Corbeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Corbeil. The network helps show where Thomas Corbeil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Corbeil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Corbeil Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Corbeil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006239
2 2006192
3 2007101
4 202043
5 202140
6 202335
7 201825
8 200623
9 202114
10 202214
11 202213
12 200412
13 202211
14 202211
15 202110
16 20216
17 20225
18 20235
19 20214
20 20234

About Thomas Corbeil

Thomas Corbeil is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Health, Infectious Diseases and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (358 citations), Occupational Therapy (100 citations), Social Psychology (109 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations) and Health (22 citations). Thomas Corbeil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tyler C. Smith, Margaret A.K. Ryan, Besa Smith, James R. Riddle, Timothy S. Wells, Gary Dean Gackstetter, Isabel G. Jacobson, Gregory Charles Gray, Tomoko I. Hooper and Paul J. Amoroso. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Child Abuse & Neglect, JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Journal of Adolescent Health and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact