Thomas Conley

608 citations
24 papers · 255 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Rhetoric and Communication Studies 5
    • Byzantine Studies and History 4

Thomas Conley

19 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Thomas Conley
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Classics 80
  • Anthropology 76
  • Archeology 47
  • Religious studies 20
  • Philosophy 44
Replace Scott C. McGill with:
Scott C. McGill United States
Barbara K. Gold United States
Julia Haig Gaisser United States
Nicolas P. Gross United States
James W. Halporn United States
Barbara Weiden Boyd France
Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Sergio Casali Italy
Leofranc Holford‐Strevens United Kingdom
Heinz-Günther Nesselrath Germany
Thomas Conley relative to Scott C. McGill United States Scott C. McGill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Scott C. McGill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Conley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Conley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Conley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Conley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Conley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Conley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Conley. The network helps show where Thomas Conley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Conley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Conley Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Conley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198460
2 198656
3 198255
4 198725
5 201615
6 198610
7 20107
8 19864
9 20003
10 20043
11 19813
12 20042
13 19832
14 20002
15 19862
16 19862
17 19781
18
Blemmydes’ Debt to Euthymios Zigabenos
19851
19 20021
20 20021

About Thomas Conley

Thomas Conley is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, Anthropology, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Islamic Studies and History (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (1 paper) and African history and culture analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (80 citations), Anthropology (76 citations), Archeology (47 citations), Religious studies (20 citations) and Philosophy (44 citations). Thomas Conley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ching Hsien Huang, Ira W. Levin, Ross Martin and Herbert W. Simons. Their work appears in journals such as Rhetorica, Communication Quarterly, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Biochemistry and Nationalities Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact