Thomas C. King

101 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Thomas C. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Oncology 581
  • Cancer Research 303
  • Molecular Biology 904
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 197
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 53
Replace Giuseppe Peri with:
Giuseppe Peri Italy
Jesse C. Chow United States
Bernd Echtenacher Germany
José L. Cohen France
Stephen D. Wolpe United States
Paul G. Hellewell United Kingdom
K. Asadullah Germany
Mark C. Dessing Netherlands
Lothar Hültner Germany
Alan D. Levine United States
Thomas C. King relative to Giuseppe Peri Italy Giuseppe Peri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Giuseppe Peri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. King. The network helps show where Thomas C. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. King Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009206
2 1989156
3 2004147
4 2001138
5 1986130
6 200791
7
Role of p53 and p16 gene alterations in determining response to concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in solid tumor.
199991
8 199882
9
A biophysical approach to capillary permeability.
198982
10 198473
11 200165
12 198763
13 198157
14 198355
15 199554
16 198754
17 199145
18 199644
19 200843
20 201542

About Thomas C. King

Thomas C. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Oncology, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (11 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (4 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (581 citations), Cancer Research (303 citations), Molecular Biology (904 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (197 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (53 citations). Thomas C. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include David Schlessinger, Howard Safran, Robert L. Low, Andrew S. Brem, David J. Morris, Kojo S.J. Elenitoba‐Johnson, Paul S. Changelian, Pingfu Feng, Jeffrey Milbrandt and Oscar C Estalilla. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, The American Journal of Surgery, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact