Thomas C. Booth

2.9k citations
72 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Booth

67 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Health Informatics 58
  • Genetics 181
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 288
  • Neurology 117
  • Neurology 55
Replace Frank Gaillard with:
Frank Gaillard Australia
So Lyung Jung South Korea
Lola B. Chambless United States
Kambiz Nael United States
Ramona Woitek Austria
Miran Han South Korea
Hossein Ghanaati Iran
Nathaniel Swinburne United States
Wenbo Li China
Thomas C. Booth relative to Frank Gaillard Australia Frank Gaillard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Frank Gaillard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Booth. The network helps show where Thomas C. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200983
2 201966
3 200965
4 202265
5 201055
6 202244
7 202140
8 202238
9 201536
10 201733
11 202130
12 201130
13 201329
14 201927
15 202026
16 202226
17 201525
18 202222
19 202321
20 202020

About Thomas C. Booth

Thomas C. Booth is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Neurology, Epidemiology and Health Informatics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (6 papers), Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (58 citations), Genetics (181 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (288 citations), Neurology (117 citations) and Neurology (55 citations). Thomas C. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Adam Waldman, Alan Jackson, David Wood, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Sébastien Ourselin, Stuart A. Taylor, Jeremy Lynch, Haris Shuaib, M. Jorge Cardoso and James H. Cole. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Clinical Neuroradiology, Clinical Radiology and European Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact