Thomas Bose

551 citations
20 papers · 395 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Bose

20 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Thomas Bose
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 141
  • Modeling and Simulation 43
  • Computer Networks and Communications 93
  • General Decision Sciences 6
  • Condensed Matter Physics 36
Replace Enys Mones with:
Enys Mones Hungary
R.A. Kosiński Poland
Saulo D. S. Reis Brazil
Marija Mitrović Dankulov Serbia
William Mather United States
Lasko Basnarkov North Macedonia
Christian L. Vestergaard France
Christopher P. Warren United States
Riitta Toivonen Finland
Ramón Xulvi-Brunet United States
Thomas Bose relative to Enys Mones Hungary Enys Mones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Enys Mones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bose. The network helps show where Thomas Bose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bose Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200965
2 201763
3 201762
4 201942
5 201838
6 201825
7 201918
8 201115
9 201011
10 201610
11 20119
12 20236
13 20196
14 20195
15 20195
16
確率的Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert方程式における相関効果
20103
17 20123
18 20123
19 20113
20 20193

About Thomas Bose

Thomas Bose is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (141 citations), Modeling and Simulation (43 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (93 citations), General Decision Sciences (6 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (36 citations). Thomas Bose has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andreagiovanni Reina, James A. R. Marshall, Steffen Trimper, Vito Trianni, Richard F. L. Evans, R.W. Chantrell, R. Cuadrado, Roman V. Chepulskii, Vaibhav Srivastava and Dmytro Apalkov. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physics Letters A, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Mathematical Psychology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact