Thomas Börjesson

35 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas Börjesson
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Plant Science 957
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 25
  • Analytical Chemistry 157
  • Biomedical Engineering 291
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 121
Replace Richard Hung with:
Richard Hung United States
Marie Chantal Lemfack Germany
Juan José R. Coque Spain
Andleeb Zehra India
Mélanie Morel‐Rouhier France
Yonglin Ren Australia
Mohd Aamir India
Mengcen Wang China
Pingsheng Ji United States
Kerry S. Burton United Kingdom
Thomas Börjesson relative to Richard Hung United States Richard Hung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Richard Hung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Börjesson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Börjesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Börjesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Börjesson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Börjesson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Börjesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Börjesson. The network helps show where Thomas Börjesson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Börjesson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Börjesson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Börjesson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002217
2 1999204
3 2013179
4 2012155
5 2013132
6 1992123
7 199088
8 200885
9
Electronic nose for odor classification of grains
199684
10 200071
11
Analysis of volatile compounds for detection of molds in stored cereals.
198969
12 201049
13 201236
14 199935
15 201029
16 200722
17 202122
18 201219
19 200518
20 200915

About Thomas Börjesson

Thomas Börjesson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Analytical Chemistry, Environmental Engineering and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (22 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (3 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (3 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (957 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (25 citations), Analytical Chemistry (157 citations), Biomedical Engineering (291 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (121 citations). Thomas Börjesson has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Johan Schnürer, U. Stöllman, Torbjörn Lundstedt, Jörgen Olsson, M. Olsen, Elisabeth Fredlund, Johan Olsson, Mats Lindblad, Michael Sulyok and Rudolf Krska. Their work appears in journals such as Cereal Chemistry, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Food Additives & Contaminants Part A, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Plant and Soil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact