Thomas Bloor

1.6k citations
18 papers · 838 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Bloor

16 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Thomas Bloor
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Literature and Literary Theory 417
  • Language and Linguistics 336
  • Linguistics and Language 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 156
  • Communication 62
Replace Meriel Bloor with:
Meriel Bloor United Kingdom
Paul Garrett United States
Alison Margaret Duguid Italy
Priyanvada Abeywickrama United States
Yukio Tono Japan
María José Luzón Marco Spain
Polly Tse Hong Kong
John Macalister New Zealand
Lynne Flowerdew Hong Kong
Thierry Chanier France
Thomas Bloor relative to Meriel Bloor United Kingdom Meriel Bloor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Meriel Bloor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bloor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bloor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bloor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bloor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bloor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bloor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bloor. The network helps show where Thomas Bloor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bloor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bloor Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bloor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2004221
2 2013168
3 1998149
4 2013100
5 201348
6 199134
7
What Do Language Students Know About Grammar
198632
8
Playing Safe with Predictions: Hedging, Attribution and Conditions in Economic Forecasting.
198719
9 199618
10 201414
11 199611
12 20148
13 20176
14 20175
15
Languages for Specific Purposes: Practice and Theory. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 19.
19863
16 19792
17 19980
18 20200

About Thomas Bloor

Thomas Bloor is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, History and Philosophy of Science and Accounting, having authored 18 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Multilingual Education and Policy (1 paper), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), African history and culture analysis (1 paper), Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (417 citations), Language and Linguistics (336 citations), Linguistics and Language (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (156 citations) and Communication (62 citations). Thomas Bloor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Meriel Bloor, Neil J. Anderson and Wondwosen Tamrat. Their work appears in journals such as English in Education, Modern Language Journal, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Pragmatics & beyond. New series and Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact