Thomas Beier

3.4k citations
93 papers · 2.7k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Beier

84 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Thomas Beier
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 602
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 295
  • Radiation 310
  • Metals and Alloys 94
Replace M. Kobayashi with:
M. Kobayashi Japan
Michael Milgram Canada
Hirofumi Watanabe Japan
T.E. Parker United States
H. Maecker Germany
D. H. Dolan United States
A. K. Head Australia
A. Yamamoto Japan
J. E. Hammerberg United States
O. Motojima Japan
Thomas Beier relative to M. Kobayashi Japan M. Kobayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
M. Kobayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Beier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Beier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Beier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Beier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Beier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Beier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Beier. The network helps show where Thomas Beier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Beier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Beier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Beier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000223
2 2012214
3 2004194
4 2014176
5 2001163
6 2000135
7 2000117
8 2017103
9 199997
10 201778
11 201666
12 201760
13 199959
14 198958
15 199857
16 199856
17 201055
18 199652
19 198838
20 201736

About Thomas Beier

Thomas Beier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanical Engineering and Radiation, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (55 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (25 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (23 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (19 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (9 papers), Engineering Structural Analysis Methods (7 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (7 papers) and Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (602 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (295 citations), Radiation (310 citations) and Metals and Alloys (94 citations). Thomas Beier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Zerbst, G. Soff, W. Quint, Michael Vormwald, G. Plunien, В. М. Шабаев, G. Werth, J. Verdú, H.-J. Kluge and V. A. Yerokhin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact