Thomas Bark
Impact in
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Papers in
-
- Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes 5
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 2
-
- Magnetism in coordination complexes 6
- Co-authors
- Alex von Zelewsky (7 shared papers)Olimpia Mamula (5 shared papers)Gérald Bernardinelli (3 shared papers)H. Stoeckli‐Evans (6 shared papers)Randolph P. Thummel (1 shared paper)A. Neels (3 shared papers)Alexander von Zelewsky (2 shared papers)Philippe Renaud (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chemistry - A European Journal (3 papers)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2 papers)Synthesis (1 paper)Carbon (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
Thomas Bark
15 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Inorganic Chemistry 284
- Organic Chemistry 375
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 211
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 104
- Spectroscopy 109
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bark
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bark. The network helps show where Thomas Bark may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 186 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1973 | 1 |
About Thomas Bark
Thomas Bark is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Oncology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (6 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (5 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers) and Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (284 citations), Organic Chemistry (375 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (211 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (104 citations) and Spectroscopy (109 citations). Thomas Bark has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alex von Zelewsky, Olimpia Mamula, Gérald Bernardinelli, H. Stoeckli‐Evans, Randolph P. Thummel, A. Neels, Alexander von Zelewsky, Philippe Renaud, Cyril Ollivier and Wai Li Ling. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Synthesis, Carbon and Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.