Thérèse van Elderen

1.6k citations
22 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thérèse van Elderen

22 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thérèse van Elderen
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 648
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • General Health Professions 236
  • Social Psychology 160
  • Clinical Psychology 152
Replace Mary Gutmann with:
Mary Gutmann United States
Biing‐Jiun Shen United States
Zachary M. Shnek Canada
Jan Lisspers Sweden
Birgitt Marten‐Mittag Germany
Kurt Fritzsche Germany
Marja‐Leena Kristofferzon Sweden
Ruud A.M. Erdman Netherlands
Birthe D. Pedersen Denmark
Lesley Stafford Australia
Thérèse van Elderen relative to Mary Gutmann United States Mary Gutmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Mary Gutmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thérèse van Elderen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thérèse van Elderen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thérèse van Elderen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thérèse van Elderen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thérèse van Elderen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thérèse van Elderen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thérèse van Elderen. The network helps show where Thérèse van Elderen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thérèse van Elderen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thérèse van Elderen Line = papers co-authored together Thérèse van Elderen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999329
2 1999279
3 200698
4 200382
5 200457
6 200643
7 199941
8 200740
9 200640
10 200734
11 199733
12 200528
13 200324
14 199423
15 199618
16 199617
17 199815
18 201014
19 200112
20 20059

About Thérèse van Elderen

Thérèse van Elderen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (13 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (648 citations), Applied Psychology (75 citations), General Health Professions (236 citations), Social Psychology (160 citations) and Clinical Psychology (152 citations). Thérèse van Elderen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Myanmar. Frequent co-authors include Stan Maes, Elise Dusseldorp, Vivian Kraaij, Jacqueline J. Meulman, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Katherine Joekes, Véronique De Gucht, Vivian T. Colland, Roeline G. Kuijer and Denise T. D. de Ridder. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Psychology and Health, Health Psychology and Patient Education and Counseling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact