Theodore J. Cachey
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Loredana Polezzi (1 shared paper)Zygmunt G. Barański (3 shared papers)Jon R. Snyder (1 shared paper)Robert Holländer (2 shared papers)Michelangelo Picone (1 shared paper)William W. Hallo (1 shared paper)Raoul van Caenegem (1 shared paper)Michael McVaugh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (2 papers)CR The New Centennial Review (1 paper)Speculum (1 paper)MLN (1 paper)Quaderni d italianistica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Theodore J. Cachey
10 papers receiving 35 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Classics 35
- History 44
- Language and Linguistics 16
- Literature and Literary Theory 16
- Religious studies 5
Countries citing papers authored by Theodore J. Cachey
This map shows the geographic impact of Theodore J. Cachey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theodore J. Cachey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theodore J. Cachey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theodore J. Cachey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theodore J. Cachey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theodore J. Cachey. The network helps show where Theodore J. Cachey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theodore J. Cachey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 12 | |
| 3 | Petrarch and Dante: Anti-Dantism, Metaphysics, Tradition | 2009 | 12 |
| 4 | 1996 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 7 | Le culture di Dante : studi in onore di Robert Hollander : atti del quarto Seminario dantesco internazionale, University of Notre Dame (Ind.), USA, 25-27 settembre 2003 | 2004 | 3 |
| 8 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 9 | Petrarch & Dante : anti-Dantism, metaphysics, tradition | 2009 | 2 |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 0 |
About Theodore J. Cachey
Theodore J. Cachey is a scholar working on History, Classics, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 69 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (5 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (2 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (35 citations), History (44 citations), Language and Linguistics (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (16 citations) and Religious studies (5 citations). Theodore J. Cachey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Loredana Polezzi, Zygmunt G. Barański, Jon R. Snyder, Robert Holländer, Michelangelo Picone, William W. Hallo, Raoul van Caenegem, Michael McVaugh, Robert E. Lerner and Walter Simons. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, CR The New Centennial Review, Speculum, MLN and Quaderni d italianistica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.