Thea Daha
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Infection Control in Healthcare
- General Dentistry top 2%
- Dental Research and COVID-19
Papers in
-
- Infection Control in Healthcare 2
-
- Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management 1
- Hepatitis B Virus Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Vicki Erasmus (2 shared papers)Ed F. van Beeck (2 shared papers)Martine De Vos (2 shared papers)Jan Hendrik Richardus (2 shared papers)Anke Oenema (1 shared paper)W. Brouwer (1 shared paper)Johannes Brug (1 shared paper)Barbara S Niël-Weise (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology (2 papers)Journal of Hospital Infection (1 paper)European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Thea Daha
4 papers receiving 969 citations
Thea Daha's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Infectious Diseases 735
- General Dentistry 60
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 58
- Emergency Medical Services 75
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 50
Countries citing papers authored by Thea Daha
This map shows the geographic impact of Thea Daha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thea Daha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thea Daha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thea Daha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thea Daha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thea Daha. The network helps show where Thea Daha may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thea Daha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Systematic Review of Studies on Compliance with Hand Hygiene Guidelines in Hospital Care Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 787 |
| 2 | 2009 | 201 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 7 |
About Thea Daha
Thea Daha is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Hepatology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infection Control in Healthcare (2 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Hepatitis C virus research (1 paper), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper) and Hepatitis B Virus Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (735 citations), General Dentistry (60 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (58 citations), Emergency Medical Services (75 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (50 citations). Thea Daha has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Vicki Erasmus, Ed F. van Beeck, Martine De Vos, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Anke Oenema, W. Brouwer, Johannes Brug, Barbara S Niël-Weise, P.J. van den Broek and G. Weers-Pothoff. Their work appears in journals such as Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Journal of Hospital Infection and European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.