Thad Benefield

54 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Thad Benefield
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Health 1.1k
  • Gender Studies 465
  • Clinical Psychology 560
  • General Health Professions 449
  • Social Psychology 285
Replace J. Michael Underwood with:
J. Michael Underwood United States
Amanda L. Robinson United Kingdom
Carlos A. Cuevas United States
Melissa D. Grady United States
Suzanne C. Ouellette United States
Naomi B. Knoble United States
Elisabeth Meloni Vieira Brazil
Nancy L. Asdigian United States
Ayana Jordan United States
Xiao Xu China
Thad Benefield relative to J. Michael Underwood United States J. Michael Underwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
J. Michael Underwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thad Benefield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thad Benefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thad Benefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thad Benefield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thad Benefield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thad Benefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thad Benefield. The network helps show where Thad Benefield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thad Benefield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thad Benefield Line = papers co-authored together Thad Benefield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004405
2 2005306
3 2010147
4 2009133
5 2008117
6 200594
7 201386
8 202163
9 201555
10 201548
11 201837
12 201633
13 202124
14 200722
15 201922
16 201522
17 201817
18 202017
19 202117
20 201915

About Thad Benefield

Thad Benefield is a scholar working on Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (11 papers), Radiology practices and education (8 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.1k citations), Gender Studies (465 citations), Clinical Psychology (560 citations), General Health Professions (449 citations) and Social Psychology (285 citations). Thad Benefield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Susan T. Ennett, Vangie A. Foshee, Chirayath Suchindran, Karl E. Bauman, G. Fletcher Linder, Heathe Luz McNaughton Reyes, Katherine J. Karriker‐Jaffe, Louise M. Henderson, Robert Faris and Sarah J. Nyante. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Radiology, Academic Radiology, Cancer, The Journal of Early Adolescence and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact