Th. Blaich

2.7k citations
10 papers · 102 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Th. Blaich

10 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

Th. Blaich
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 77
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 48
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 18
  • Radiation 11
  • Aerospace Engineering 23
Replace G. Van Buren with:
G. Van Buren United States
J. Steṕaniak Russia
Soren Pontoppidan Sorensen United States
J.P. Didelez France
Yu.A. Batusov Russia
G. Tristram France
G. H. Herbert South Africa
S. Chang United States
D. Pal India
F. Balestra Italy
Th. Blaich relative to G. Van Buren United States G. Van Buren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
G. Van Buren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Th. Blaich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Th. Blaich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Th. Blaich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Th. Blaich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Th. Blaich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Th. Blaich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Th. Blaich. The network helps show where Th. Blaich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Th. Blaich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Th. Blaich Line = papers co-authored together Th. Blaich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 199645
2 199317
3 199212
4 19958
5 19966
6 19835
7 19943
8 19963
9 19932
10
Multifragmentation And The Search For The Liquid-Gas Phase Transition In Nuclear Matter
19961

About Th. Blaich

Th. Blaich is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 102 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (4 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (3 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (77 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (48 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (18 citations), Radiation (11 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (23 citations). Th. Blaich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include T. C. Sangster, M. Begemann-Blaich, H. C. Britt, M.N. Namboodiri, E. Lubkiewicz, K. Stelzer, E. Zude, H. Klingler, R. Holzmann and H. Emling. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Physics Letters B, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, The European Physical Journal A and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact