Tess E Cooper

2.0k citations
41 papers · 945 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Tess E Cooper

38 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

Tess E Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 140
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 339
  • Pharmacology 183
  • Nephrology 59
  • Physiology 192
Replace C. Lejus with:
C. Lejus France
Kamel Masmoudi France
Roberta Hines United States
Gillian C. Hall United Kingdom
Natan Noviski United States
Colin P. Hawkes United States
Paul Farquhar-Smith United Kingdom
Jamie N. Brown United States
Che‐Chen Lin Taiwan
Michael R. Uhing United States
Tess E Cooper relative to C. Lejus France C. Lejus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Lejus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tess E Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tess E Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess E Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess E Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tess E Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess E Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess E Cooper. The network helps show where Tess E Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tess E Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tess E Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Tess E Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201792
2 201787
3 202181
4 201761
5 201757
6 202150
7 201744
8 201743
9 201743
10 201738
11 201836
12 202233
13 202331
14 202228
15 201726
16 201624
17 201619
18 201916
19 201816
20 202315

About Tess E Cooper

Tess E Cooper is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Nephrology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 945 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (10 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (140 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (339 citations), Pharmacology (183 citations), Nephrology (59 citations) and Physiology (192 citations). Tess E Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston, Brian J. Anderson, Nick Wilkinson, Germaine Wong, R Andrew Moore, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto and Jonathan C. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Pain, Kidney International Reports, ANZ Journal of Surgery and Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact