Te-San Chen

21 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Te-San Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Electrochemistry 115
  • Pollution 157
  • Water Science and Technology 113
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 109
  • Bioengineering 43
Replace Kátia M. Bichinho with:
Kátia M. Bichinho Brazil
Gian Paulo Giovanni Freschi Brazil
Narsito Indonesia
Silvana A. Ramírez Argentina
Wangwang Tang China
Hongxiang Fu China
Maather F. Sawalha United States
Mithun Sikder United States
Xiaojun Jiang China
Fábio Gozzi Brazil
Te-San Chen relative to Kátia M. Bichinho Brazil Kátia M. Bichinho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Kátia M. Bichinho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Te-San Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Te-San Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Te-San Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Te-San Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Te-San Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Te-San Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Te-San Chen. The network helps show where Te-San Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Te-San Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Te-San Chen Line = papers co-authored together Te-San Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010129
2 201236
3 201433
4 201429
5 201326
6 201323
7 200721
8 201219
9 201217
10 200914
11 201610
12 20167
13 20097
14 20157
15
ANODIC DEGRADATION OF CAFFEINE UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS
20156
16 20096
17 20175
18 20125
19 20164
20 20133

About Te-San Chen

Te-San Chen is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Water Science and Technology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Analytical Chemistry and Pollution, having authored 21 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (12 papers), Advanced oxidation water treatment (7 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (5 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (5 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (4 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (3 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (115 citations), Pollution (157 citations), Water Science and Technology (113 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (109 citations) and Bioengineering (43 citations). Te-San Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Kuo‐Lin Huang, Jialong Chen, Ean-Tun Liaw, Yi-Lung Yeh, Ting‐Chien Chen, How‐Ran Chao, Lien‐Te Hsieh, Chi-Ying Hsieh, Kuan‐Chung Chen and Yi‐Ming Kuo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact