Teja Roch

43 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

Teja Roch
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Computational Mechanics 420
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 73
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 237
  • Mechanical Engineering 135
  • Materials Chemistry 108
Replace Tim Kunze with:
Tim Kunze Germany
Iaroslav M. Gnilitskyi Ukraine
Ainara Rodríguez Spain
Camilo Florian Spain
Caterina Gaudiuso Italy
Peter A. Atanasov Bulgaria
Nicoleta E. Voicu Netherlands
Pavel Škarvada Czechia
Xxx Sedao France
Negin Beryani Nezafat Iran
Teja Roch relative to Tim Kunze Germany Tim Kunze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Tim Kunze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Teja Roch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teja Roch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teja Roch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teja Roch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teja Roch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teja Roch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teja Roch. The network helps show where Teja Roch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Teja Roch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Teja Roch Line = papers co-authored together Teja Roch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012157
2 201768
3 201447
4 201044
5 201143
6 201339
7 201237
8 201537
9 201637
10 201031
11 201528
12 201528
13 201426
14 200625
15 201625
16 201524
17 201624
18 201021
19 201121
20 201418

About Teja Roch

Teja Roch is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Materials Chemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (21 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (7 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (6 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (3 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (3 papers), Graphene research and applications (2 papers) and Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (420 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (73 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (237 citations), Mechanical Engineering (135 citations) and Materials Chemistry (108 citations). Teja Roch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Andrés Fabián Lasagni, Matthias Bieda, Valentin Lang, Karl Leo, Lars Müller‐Meskamp, Reinhard Scholz, Aljoscha Roch, Tim Kunze, Yong Hyun Kim and Simone Hofmann. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Engineering Materials, Diamond and Related Materials, Thin Solid Films, Applied Surface Science and Carbon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact