Tara L. Mitchell

402 citations
5 papers · 269 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

  • Law top 1%
    • Jury Decision Making Processes
    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Papers in

Tara L. Mitchell

5 papers receiving 245 citations

Tara L. Mitchell's Hit Papers

Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment. 2005 · 215 citations
2150+7+14Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Tara L. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Law 96
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84
  • Sociology and Political Science 148
  • Social Psychology 66
Replace Lynne ForsterLee with:
Lynne ForsterLee Australia
Douglas J. Narby United States
Ellen Wessel Norway
Jennifer Groscup United States
Tarika Daftary‐Kapur United States
Liza Zvi Israel
Joshua Dressler United States
Kimberly D. Richman United States
Christina A. Studebaker United States
Edward J. Imwinkelried United States
Tara L. Mitchell relative to Lynne ForsterLee Australia Lynne ForsterLee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Lynne ForsterLee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tara L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tara L. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tara L. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tara L. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tara L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tara L. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tara L. Mitchell. The network helps show where Tara L. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Tara L. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tara L. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Tara L. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment.
Hit paper breakdown →
2005215
2 200743
3 20068
4 20212
5
The influence of the cross -race effect on lineup construction and fairness
20051

About Tara L. Mitchell

Tara L. Mitchell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Law, having authored 5 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper), Jury Decision Making Processes (1 paper) and Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (96 citations), Gender Studies (78 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (148 citations) and Social Psychology (66 citations). Tara L. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christian A. Meissner, Jeffrey E. Pfeifer, John C. Brigham, Margaret Bull Kovera, Kristin E. Silver, Jaclyn A. Siegel and RaeAnn E. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Human Behavior, Psychology of Men & Masculinity and Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact