Tamí Mott

73 papers receiving 834 citations

Peers

Tamí Mott
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ecological Modeling 194
  • Global and Planetary Change 598
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 195
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 284
  • Social Psychology 179
Replace Kátia Gomes Facure with:
Kátia Gomes Facure Brazil
Alejandro R. Giraudo Argentina
Maria Cristina Espósito Brazil
Gerardo C. Leynaud Argentina
Leonardo Vignoli Italy
Franco L. Souza Brazil
Raffael Ernst Germany
Raúl Maneyro Uruguay
Marcelo Gordo Brazil
Robert B. Stuebing Malaysia
Tamí Mott relative to Kátia Gomes Facure Brazil Kátia Gomes Facure's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Kátia Gomes Facure · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamí Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamí Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamí Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamí Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamí Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamí Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamí Mott. The network helps show where Tamí Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamí Mott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamí Mott Line = papers co-authored together Tamí Mott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201289
2 200968
3 201134
4 201633
5 202031
6 202025
7 201625
8 200824
9 202024
10 201423
11 202023
12 200923
13 201522
14 201122
15 201619
16 201119
17 200818
18 201117
19 202016
20 202215

About Tamí Mott

Tamí Mott is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology and Genetics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 858 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (63 papers), Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (19 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (10 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (8 papers) and Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (194 citations), Global and Planetary Change (598 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (195 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (284 citations) and Social Psychology (179 citations). Tamí Mott has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christine Strüssmann, David R. Vieites, Miguel Tréfaut Rodrigues, Luı́s Felipe Toledo, Ricardo J. Pereira, Josino Costa Moreira, Anyelet Valencia‐Aguilar, Frederico Peres, Wanderlei Antônio Pignati and Ana Correia Simões. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Systematics and Biodiversity, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Herpetologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact