Taili Liu

562 citations
14 papers · 458 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Taili Liu

14 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Taili Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Polymers and Plastics 98
  • Materials Chemistry 302
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 354
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 81
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 29
Replace Nicholas Williams with:
Nicholas Williams United States
Benjamin Daiber Netherlands
Tika R. Kafle United States
A. Jolene Mork United States
Goutam Ghosh India
Eric Kai‐Hsiang Yu United States
Xiangwei Qu China
Min Ji Hong United States
Cleber A. Amorim Brazil
Yarong He China
Taili Liu relative to Nicholas Williams United States Nicholas Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Nicholas Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Taili Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Taili Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taili Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taili Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Taili Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taili Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taili Liu. The network helps show where Taili Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Taili Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Taili Liu Line = papers co-authored together Taili Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019247
2 201553
3 201535
4 202432
5 201917
6 202117
7 201614
8 202314
9 202210
10 20218
11 20204
12 20214
13 20232
14 20241

About Taili Liu

Taili Liu is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry, Surgery and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 14 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Perovskite Materials and Applications (7 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (5 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (4 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (3 papers), ZnO doping and properties (2 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (2 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (2 papers) and Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (98 citations), Materials Chemistry (302 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (354 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (81 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (29 citations). Taili Liu has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Sai‐Wing Tsang, Weiran Cao, Yixing Yang, Xiaolin Yan, Song Chen, Lei Qian, Zhiqiang Guan, Chun‐Sing Lee, Jian Qing and Yuanhang Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Materials Horizons, Advanced Materials, Journal of Materials Chemistry A and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact