T. Kiel

2.4k citations
16 papers · 110 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

T. Kiel

14 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

T. Kiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Structural Biology 10
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 42
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 12
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 44
  • Biomedical Engineering 57
Replace Tobias A. de Jong with:
Tobias A. de Jong Netherlands
P. Gouraud France
S. Baudot France
Joana D. Santos Portugal
Chanwoong Park South Korea
Leonid Gilburd Canada
Helena Weigand Switzerland
N. Loubet United States
Ion M. Hancu Spain
Kouroch Mahdjoubi France
T. Kiel relative to Tobias A. de Jong Netherlands Tobias A. de Jong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tobias A. de Jong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Kiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Kiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Kiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Kiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Kiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Kiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Kiel. The network helps show where T. Kiel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Kiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Kiel Line = papers co-authored together T. Kiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201532
2 201828
3 202110
4 20177
5 20247
6 20255
7 20225
8 20184
9 20253
10 20173
11 20212
12 20162
13 20201
14 20151
15 20200
16 20230

About T. Kiel

T. Kiel is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (8 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications (3 papers), Cellular and Composite Structures (3 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (3 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (3 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (2 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (10 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (42 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (12 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (44 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (57 citations). T. Kiel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Busch, F. Intravaia, Stephan Irsen, Stefan Lindén, Th. Weber, Sascha Schäfer, Sergey V. Yalunin, Philip Trøst Kristensen, Benjamin Schröder and Claus Ropers. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Optics Letters, Physical Review B, Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact