T. Ido

4.0k citations
125 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

T. Ido

117 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

T. Ido
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.6k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
  • Materials Chemistry 461
  • Aerospace Engineering 209
  • Organic Chemistry 143
Replace I. Fidone with:
I. Fidone France
H. Röhr Germany
D. A. García–Hernández Spain
Yu. V. Lobanov Russia
T. H. Markert United States
D.E. Baldwin United States
Pankaj Jain India
V. N. Kondratyev Russia
B. Borderie France
A. Bussière France
T. Ido relative to I. Fidone France I. Fidone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.6×
I. Fidone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Ido

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Ido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Ido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Ido more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Ido

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Ido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Ido. The network helps show where T. Ido may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Ido, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Ido Line = papers co-authored together T. Ido links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005175
2 2006124
3 2005107
4 201393
5 200688
6 200584
7 202159
8 201357
9 200244
10 200741
11 201537
12 200637
13 200735
14 201634
15 201534
16 201033
17 201332
18 201830
19 201530
20 199929

About T. Ido

T. Ido is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (112 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (57 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (39 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (36 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (33 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (22 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (16 papers) and Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.6k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (461 citations), Aerospace Engineering (209 citations) and Organic Chemistry (143 citations). T. Ido has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Y. Miura, A. Nishizawa, Y. Hamada, K. Kamiya, K. Itoh, Y. Nagashima, K. Hoshino, Y. Kawasumi, A. Shimizu and Rika Matsumoto. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact