T. Dimpfl

35 papers receiving 1.5k citations

T. Dimpfl's Hit Papers

Cytokeratin-Positive Cells in the Bone Marrow and Survival of Patients with Stage I, II, or III Breast Cancer 2000 · 753 citations
7530+8+17Years since publication250500750

Peers

T. Dimpfl
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Cancer Research 483
  • Rheumatology 322
  • Oncology 544
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 121
  • Urology 97
Replace Eble Jn with:
Eble Jn United States
Renate Pichler Austria
Christian Vokuhl Germany
R. Villet France
Shigeo Aizawa Japan
Dariusz Wydra Poland
Aslı Yilmaz Canada
Karin S. Kapp Austria
Juan A. del Regato United States
Rajkumar Venkatramani United States
T. Dimpfl relative to Eble Jn United States Eble Jn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Eble Jn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Dimpfl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Dimpfl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Dimpfl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Dimpfl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Dimpfl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Dimpfl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Dimpfl. The network helps show where T. Dimpfl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Dimpfl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Dimpfl Line = papers co-authored together T. Dimpfl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cytokeratin-Positive Cells in the Bone Marrow and Survival of Patients with Stage I, II, or III Breast Cancer
Hit paper breakdown →
2000753
2 2001151
3 2010114
4 200292
5 200058
6 200447
7 200336
8 200336
9 199935
10 201534
11 200332
12 200226
13 200024
14 199924
15 200120
16 200320
17 200020
18 201518
19 201517
20 200715

About T. Dimpfl

T. Dimpfl is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery, Cancer Research, Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (17 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (7 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (483 citations), Rheumatology (322 citations), Oncology (544 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (121 citations) and Urology (97 citations). T. Dimpfl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Janni, Ursula Peschers, Stephan Braun, Christina Kentenich, F. Hepp, Katharina Jundt, Günter Schlimok, Peter E. Müller, Klaus Pantel and Gert Riethmüller. Their work appears in journals such as International Urogynecology Journal, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact