T. Briers

923 citations
23 papers · 831 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

T. Briers

23 papers receiving 755 citations

Peers

T. Briers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Insect Science 311
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 392
  • Reproductive Medicine 88
  • Genetics 268
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 115
Replace Kate M. Baldwin with:
Kate M. Baldwin United States
G Lavorgna Italy
Wen Lu China
Balaji Rajashekar Estonia
Verónica Narváez‐Padilla Mexico
Michelle L. Bland United States
Carll Goodpasture United States
Bente Langvad Hansen Denmark
Günter Kamp Germany
A. Pogačnik Slovenia
T. Briers relative to Kate M. Baldwin United States Kate M. Baldwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Kate M. Baldwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Briers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Briers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Briers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Briers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Briers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Briers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Briers. The network helps show where T. Briers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Briers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Briers Line = papers co-authored together T. Briers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985180
2 1987106
3 199449
4 198544
5 198042
6 198140
7 198239
8 199335
9 199434
10 198329
11 198429
12 198426
13 198126
14 198125
15 199525
16 198319
17 198419
18 198317
19 198217
20 198313

About T. Briers

T. Briers is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (12 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (311 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (392 citations), Reproductive Medicine (88 citations), Genetics (268 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (115 citations). T. Briers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Arnold De Loof, John K. Koeppe, Gae E. Kovalick, Roger Huybrechts, Morton S. Fuchs, Thomas T. Chen, D E Pollet, Hugo Vanderstichele, E.J. Nouwen and Marc E. De Broe. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, Physiological Entomology, Biochemistry, Lung Cancer and Cell and Tissue Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact