T. Bernát

44 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

T. Bernát
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 196
  • Geophysics 113
  • Radiation 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 103
  • Computational Mechanics 57
Replace J. Sater with:
J. Sater United States
Masatake Yoshida Japan
A. Fertman Russia
V. N. Amosov Russia
Larry R. Foreman United States
J. Sánchez United States
G. Pucella Italy
V. P. Efremov Russia
M. E. Foord United States
A. J. Iverson United States
T. Bernát relative to J. Sater United States J. Sater's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
J. Sater · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Bernát

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Bernát's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Bernát with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Bernát more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Bernát

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Bernát. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Bernát. The network helps show where T. Bernát may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Bernát, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Bernát Line = papers co-authored together T. Bernát links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201647
2 199943
3 199632
4 199624
5 200319
6 200618
7 198517
8 200516
9 197313
10 198312
11 198710
12 200110
13 19859
14 19998
15 19977
16 19757
17 20007
18 20166
19 20046
20 19895

About T. Bernát

T. Bernát is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (17 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (14 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (7 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Laser Design and Applications (4 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (196 citations), Geophysics (113 citations), Radiation (56 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (103 citations) and Computational Mechanics (57 citations). T. Bernát has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include E. R. Mapoles, J.H. Campbell, G. W. Collins, Lijia Jiang, D. N. Bittner, J. D. Sater, Yongfeng Lu, B. Kozioziemski, G. W. Collins and G. W. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Science & Technology, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Review of Scientific Instruments, Laser and Particle Beams and Physical review. B..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact