T. Bendix

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

T. Bendix
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Pharmacology 581
  • Rehabilitation 165
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 333
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 25
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 88
Replace Jan Sture Skouen with:
Jan Sture Skouen Norway
Mary Kate McDonnell United States
Cleofás Rodríguez‐Blanco Spain
Jan Pool Netherlands
Sandra Marina dos Reis United Kingdom
Jessica J. Wong Canada
Mehdi Kargarfard Iran
Hainan Yu Canada
Eva Rasmussen-Barr Sweden
Kristi Randhawa Canada
T. Bendix relative to Jan Sture Skouen Norway Jan Sture Skouen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jan Sture Skouen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Bendix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Bendix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Bendix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Bendix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Bendix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Bendix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Bendix. The network helps show where T. Bendix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Bendix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Bendix Line = papers co-authored together T. Bendix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007268
2 1982198
3 1996117
4 1988112
5 1998107
6 1995100
7 199798
8 198997
9 200857
10 199554
11 199243
12
Adjustment of the seated workplace--with special reference to heights and inclinations of seat and table.
198738
13 199631
14 198325
15 200822
16 200720
17 198416
18 198614
19 202110
20
[Predictive factors of the effect of multidisciplinary, intensive rehabilitation of back pain. Demographic, socioeconomic and physical factors].
20003

About T. Bendix

T. Bendix is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (10 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Sports Performance and Training (2 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (2 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (1 paper) and Color perception and design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (581 citations), Rehabilitation (165 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (333 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (25 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (88 citations). T. Bendix has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ane Friis Bendix, Thomas Christensen, Henrik Kehlet, Claus Manniche, Tue Secher Jensen, Per Kjær, Joan Solgaard Sørensen, H Albert, Christine Lund and E Busch. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Applied Ergonomics, Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Clinical Rehabilitation and Clinical Biomechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact