Susan Appe

52 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Susan Appe
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Development 87
  • Public Administration 59
  • Demography 112
  • Finance 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 283
Replace L.W.M. Schulpen with:
L.W.M. Schulpen Netherlands
Mark Sidel United States
Carmen Malena Canada
Jennifer Y.J. Hsu Canada
Nilima Gulrajani United Kingdom
Hagai Katz Israel
Jamie Levine Daniel United States
Diana Cammack United Kingdom
Michael Woolcock United States
Raúl Delgado Wise Mexico
Susan Appe relative to L.W.M. Schulpen Netherlands L.W.M. Schulpen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
L.W.M. Schulpen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Appe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Appe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Appe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Appe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Appe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Appe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Appe. The network helps show where Susan Appe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Susan Appe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Susan Appe Line = papers co-authored together Susan Appe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201530
2 201729
3 201726
4 201925
5 201724
6
The Concept and Context of the Engaged University in the Global South: Lessons from Latin America to Guide a Research Agenda.
201720
7 201919
8 201418
9 201516
10 201715
11 201914
12 201113
13 201512
14 201911
15 201310
16 201110
17 201910
18 20159
19 20208
20 20198

About Susan Appe

Susan Appe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Development, Finance and Public Administration, having authored 54 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (27 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (18 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (14 papers), International Development and Aid (10 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (10 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (10 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (5 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (87 citations), Public Administration (59 citations), Demography (112 citations), Finance (81 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (283 citations). Susan Appe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ecuador and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Barragán, Allison Schnable, Stephen Jackson, Jennifer Dodge, David A. Campbell, Justice Nyigmah Bawole, Peter Adjei‐Bamfo, Ashley Fox, Hyoeun Kim and J. Ramón Gil-García. Their work appears in journals such as VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Administrative Theory & Praxis, Journal of Public Affairs Education and Nonprofit Policy Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact