Sue E. Samson

51 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Sue E. Samson
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Sensory Systems 249
  • Physiology 376
  • Biochemistry 88
  • Physiology 45
  • Molecular Biology 634
Replace Ing‐Jun Chen with:
Ing‐Jun Chen Taiwan
Shuangtao Ma China
Lívia L. Camargo United Kingdom
Santosh Kumar Mishra India
David F. Fitzpatrick United States
Bin‐Nan Wu Taiwan
Keshore R. Bidasee United States
Aldo Pinto Italy
István András Szijártó Germany
Dachun Yang China
Sue E. Samson relative to Ing‐Jun Chen Taiwan Ing‐Jun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Ing‐Jun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sue E. Samson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue E. Samson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue E. Samson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue E. Samson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue E. Samson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue E. Samson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue E. Samson. The network helps show where Sue E. Samson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sue E. Samson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sue E. Samson Line = papers co-authored together Sue E. Samson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015223
2 2015172
3 198898
4 199285
5 200360
6 199759
7 199555
8 199452
9 199748
10 201745
11 198942
12 200742
13 200040
14 201340
15 198536
16 198636
17 200336
18 199032
19 199631
20 200529

About Sue E. Samson

Sue E. Samson is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Physiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (17 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (13 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (11 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (11 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (9 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (5 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (249 citations), Physiology (376 citations), Biochemistry (88 citations), Physiology (45 citations) and Molecular Biology (634 citations). Sue E. Samson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Ashok K. Grover, Victor P. Fomin, Chiu‐Yin Kwan, A. K. Grover, Adel B. Elmoselhi, Christine Misquitta, John Xavier Wilson, Islam Ullah Khan, Eva S. Werstiuk and Magdalena M. Szewczyk. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Cell Calcium, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact