Stuart Weeks
Impact in
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Philosophy top 10%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Reformed Theology and Governance
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 28
- Classics 1
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Loren T. Stuckenbruck (3 shared papers)Simon Gathercole (2 shared papers)R. W. L. Moberly (2 shared papers)James L. Crenshaw (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (2 papers)Journal for the Study of Judaism (1 paper)Vetus Testamentum (1 paper)Biblical Interpretation (1 paper)Durham Research Online (Durham University) (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stuart Weeks
18 papers receiving 101 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Religious studies 151
- Philosophy 24
- Archeology 7
- Classics 3
- Anthropology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Weeks
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Weeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Weeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Weeks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Weeks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Weeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Weeks. The network helps show where Stuart Weeks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Weeks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 58 | |
| 2 | Early Jewish and Christian monotheism | 2004 | 25 |
| 3 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 4 | An Introduction to the Study of Wisdom Literature | 2010 | 19 |
| 5 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 12 | The Medieval Hebrew and Aramaic Texts of Tobit | 2005 | 2 |
| 13 | Some neglected texts of Tobit : the third Greek version. | 2006 | 2 |
| 14 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 15 | Predictive and prophetic literature : can Neferti help us read the Bible? | 2010 | 2 |
| 16 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 18 | The Song of Moses: Exploring the LORD 's Wrath Against Disloyal Israel | 2005 | 1 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 1 |
About Stuart Weeks
Stuart Weeks is a scholar working on Religious studies, Classics, Archeology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 29 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (28 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (151 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), Archeology (7 citations), Classics (3 citations) and Anthropology (3 citations). Stuart Weeks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Loren T. Stuckenbruck, Simon Gathercole, R. W. L. Moberly and James L. Crenshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal for the Study of Judaism, Vetus Testamentum, Biblical Interpretation and Durham Research Online (Durham University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.