Stuart Renwick

608 citations
22 papers · 509 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart Renwick

19 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Stuart Renwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Cancer Research 264
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 144
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 65
  • Surgery 119
  • Oncology 35
Replace K A HULTBORN with:
K A HULTBORN Sweden
Daniel Ramos United States
Peggie A. Findlay United States
M. C. B. J. E. Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert Netherlands
Graziano Meneghini Italy
Lorenzo Scardina Italy
Peter Konstantiniuk Austria
A. Hamblin Letton United States
Shih‐Ya Ma Taiwan
Anna Rita Cervino Italy
Stuart Renwick relative to K A HULTBORN Sweden K A HULTBORN's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
K A HULTBORN · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Renwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Renwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Renwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Renwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Renwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Renwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Renwick. The network helps show where Stuart Renwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Renwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Renwick Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Renwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Mammary lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer.
1995235
2 200170
3 196868
4 196832
5 200317
6
Blood flow after reconstructive arterial surgery measured by implanted electromagnetic flow probes.
196815
7 199415
8 196710
9 19669
10 19918
11 19966
12 19694
13 19694
14 19683
15 19793
16 19692
17 19692
18 19722
19 19761
20 19791

About Stuart Renwick

Stuart Renwick is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (5 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Infant Nutrition and Health (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper) and Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (264 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (144 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (65 citations), Surgery (119 citations) and Oncology (35 citations). Stuart Renwick has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert B Howman-Giles, Peter Martin, George Ramsey‐Stewart, John F. Thompson, David J. Malouf, R F Uren, Roger F. Uren, David J. Gillett, John P. Royle and John Loewenthal. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, British journal of surgery, World Journal of Surgery, ANZ Journal of Surgery and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact