Stuart Lynn
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Papers in
-
- Astro and Planetary Science 3
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 2
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 2
- Co-authors
- Alexandra Eveleigh (1 shared paper)Anna L. Cox (1 shared paper)Charlene I. Jennett (1 shared paper)Michael Parrish (2 shared papers)Klaus-Michael Aye (1 shared paper)David R. Miller (1 shared paper)Arfon M. Smith (1 shared paper)Ganna Portyankina (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Astronomical Journal (2 papers)Icarus (1 paper)Frontiers in bioscience (1 paper)EBioMedicine (1 paper)DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Stuart Lynn
8 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Ecological Modeling 36
- Computer Science Applications 34
- Instrumentation 18
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 71
- Information Systems and Management 18
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Lynn
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Lynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Lynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Lynn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Lynn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Lynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Lynn. The network helps show where Stuart Lynn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Lynn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 4 | PLANET HUNTERS. VII. DISCOVERY OF A NEW LOW-MASS, LOW-DENSITY PLANET (PH3 C) ORBITING KEPLER-289 WITH MASS MEASUREMENTS OF TWO ADDITIONAL PLANETS (PH3 B AND D) | 2014 | 22 |
| 5 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 3 |
About Stuart Lynn
Stuart Lynn is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecological Modeling, Computer Science Applications, Biochemistry and Information Systems and Management, having authored 8 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (1 paper) and Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (36 citations), Computer Science Applications (34 citations), Instrumentation (18 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (71 citations) and Information Systems and Management (18 citations). Stuart Lynn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Eveleigh, Anna L. Cox, Charlene I. Jennett, Michael Parrish, Klaus-Michael Aye, David R. Miller, Arfon M. Smith, Ganna Portyankina, Megan E. Schwamb and Candice Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as The Astronomical Journal, Icarus, Frontiers in bioscience, EBioMedicine and DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.