Stuart B. Field

2.8k citations
49 papers · 2.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart B. Field

48 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Stuart B. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Condensed Matter Physics 941
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 884
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 151
  • Computational Mechanics 153
  • Ocean Engineering 80
Replace Naoya Okamoto with:
Naoya Okamoto Japan
Wei Xin Lu China
Michael B. Isichenko United States
Shigeki Sakai Japan
J. F. Gouyet France
M A Cayless
Sven Linzen Germany
Robert J. Thompson United States
J.F. Whitaker United States
Mario Liu Germany
Stuart B. Field relative to Naoya Okamoto Japan Naoya Okamoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Naoya Okamoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart B. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart B. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart B. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart B. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart B. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart B. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart B. Field. The network helps show where Stuart B. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart B. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart B. Field Line = papers co-authored together Stuart B. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989286
2 1995256
3 1997235
4 2004192
5 1996120
6 201693
7 200287
8 199085
9 199685
10 201976
11 198561
12 199558
13 198556
14 199655
15 199740
16 199639
17 202039
18 199535
19 199333
20 201830

About Stuart B. Field

Stuart B. Field is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mathematical Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (17 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (3 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (3 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (2 papers) and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (941 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (884 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (151 citations), Computational Mechanics (153 citations) and Ocean Engineering (80 citations). Stuart B. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Franco Nori, M. A. Kastner, J. H. F. Scott-Thomas, D.A. Antoniadis, Henry I. Smith, Gheorghe Stan, Jennifer Groth, Cynthia J. Olson, John M. Martinis and Xinsheng Ling. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physica C Superconductivity, Europhysics Letters (EPL), Journal of Applied Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact