Steves W Ring

511 citations
6 papers · 432 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes 4
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 1

Steves W Ring

5 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Steves W Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Transplantation 124
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 140
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 39
  • Surgery 135
  • Nephrology 18
Replace Stephen M. S. Ting with:
Stephen M. S. Ting United Kingdom
Sonia Velez‐Roa Belgium
Richard H. Merrill United States
Thomas Kung Germany
J Julien France
Markus Mueller Germany
Nicholls Mg New Zealand
Stanislas Czekalski Poland
U Steiger Switzerland
Katarina Rosenlöf Finland
Steves W Ring relative to Stephen M. S. Ting United Kingdom Stephen M. S. Ting's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Stephen M. S. Ting · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steves W Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steves W Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steves W Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steves W Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steves W Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steves W Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steves W Ring. The network helps show where Steves W Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steves W Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steves W Ring Line = papers co-authored together Steves W Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1990351
2 200943
3
Normalization of sympathetic nervous system function after orthotopic cardiac transplant in man.
198726
4 20027
5 20204
6 19891

About Steves W Ring

Steves W Ring is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 6 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (4 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (124 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (140 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (39 citations), Surgery (135 citations) and Nephrology (18 citations). Steves W Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald G. Victor, Susanne F. Vissing, Barbara J. Morgan, Richard S. A. Tindall, Peter Hanson, Urs Scherrer, Pramod K. Mohanty, Juan D. Arenas, Mei Han and Bhavna Lavingia. Their work appears in journals such as Human Immunology, New England Journal of Medicine, Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals and Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact