Steven Mock

469 citations
16 papers · 297 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Steven Mock

14 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Steven Mock
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 130
  • Sociology and Political Science 170
  • Communication 17
  • General Decision Sciences 3
  • Social Psychology 26
Replace Jonathan Leader Maynard with:
Jonathan Leader Maynard United Kingdom
Edward C. Holland United States
Jeffry R. Halverson United States
Patrick Kraft United States
Anton K. Jacobs United States
Simon Frankel Pratt United Kingdom
Rolfe Peterson United States
Stephen Benedict Dyson United States
Jonathan Harris United Kingdom
Jeffrey Lyons United States
Steven Mock relative to Jonathan Leader Maynard United Kingdom Jonathan Leader Maynard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jonathan Leader Maynard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Mock. The network helps show where Steven Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Steven Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Mock Line = papers co-authored together Steven Mock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012104
2 201386
3 200831
4 201425
5 201624
6 20219
7 20125
8 19684
9 20192
10
The Ideological Conflict Project: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations
20152
11 20141
12 20051
13 20111
14 20201
15 20131
16 20150

About Steven Mock

Steven Mock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 16 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (2 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (130 citations), Sociology and Political Science (170 citations), Communication (17 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations) and Social Psychology (26 citations). Steven Mock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daphne Halikiopoulou, Sofia Vasilopoulou, Thomas Homer‐Dixon, Manjana Milkoreit, Tobias Schröder, Paul Thagard, Stephen Quilley, Matto Mildenberger and Jonathan Leader Maynard. Their work appears in journals such as Nations and Nationalism, Perspectives on Politics, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Cambridge Review of International Affairs and Journal of Social and Political Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact