Steven Feld

447 citations
20 papers · 331 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Steven Feld

19 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Steven Feld
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 37
  • Surgery 161
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 83
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 42
Replace Aurélie Bourdon with:
Aurélie Bourdon France
Takashi Murota Japan
J Vizdá Czechia
Mahmood Ebrahimi United States
Ali Faik Yılmaz Türkiye
J. Ramanathan United States
Rajiv K. Singal Canada
Breda Pečovnik Balon Slovenia
T D Moon United States
Gerald Hollander United States
Steven Feld relative to Aurélie Bourdon France Aurélie Bourdon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Aurélie Bourdon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Feld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Feld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Feld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Feld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Feld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Feld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Feld. The network helps show where Steven Feld may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven Feld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Feld Line = papers co-authored together Steven Feld links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199758
2 199643
3 199740
4 199531
5 199128
6 200528
7 198318
8 199412
9 199611
10 198711
11 19959
12
Results of coronary artery stenting in women versus men: a single center experience.
20038
13 20007
14 20087
15 20025
16 19944
17 19954
18 20004
19 19963
20 19950

About Steven Feld

Steven Feld is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (37 citations), Surgery (161 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (83 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (42 citations). Steven Feld has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Smalling, John T. Harrigan, Olle Kjellgren, George Schroth, William K. Vaughn, James Amirian, Joseph Canterino, Vernon Anderson, Ken Fujise and Samuel Lurie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Circulation, Journal of Interventional Cardiology and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact