Steven E. Carpenter

433 citations
19 papers · 205 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Steven E. Carpenter

18 papers receiving 177 citations

Peers

Steven E. Carpenter
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Insect Science 110
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 92
  • Cell Biology 64
  • Plant Science 137
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 28
Replace K. Przybył with:
K. Przybył Poland
Jonathan L. Frank United States
Jerry W. Riffle United States
Robert A. Tanner United Kingdom
S McMullan-Fisher Australia
Martina Vašutová Czechia
Bridget J. Piculell United States
Amanda F. Currie United Kingdom
D. J. Avery United Kingdom
Marc Kleinhentz France
Steven E. Carpenter relative to K. Przybył Poland K. Przybył's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
K. Przybył · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Carpenter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Carpenter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Carpenter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Carpenter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Carpenter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Carpenter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Carpenter. The network helps show where Steven E. Carpenter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Steven E. Carpenter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven E. Carpenter Line = papers co-authored together Steven E. Carpenter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 198838
2 198735
3 199032
4 199327
5 199021
6 198210
7 19838
8 19837
9
Los hongos de Colombia - VII: Leotiaceae - IV: Hymenoscyphus Caudatus and related species from Colombia and adjacent regions
19826
10 19875
11
Los hongos de Colombia - IV. Bisporella Triseptata and its allies in Colombia
19783
12 19883
13 19803
14 19882
15 19781
16 19881
17 19781
18 19781
19 19781

About Steven E. Carpenter

Steven E. Carpenter is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Insect Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (13 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (10 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (110 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (92 citations), Cell Biology (64 citations), Plant Science (137 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (28 citations). Steven E. Carpenter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Harmon, James M. Trappe, Joseph F. Ammirati, Bruce A. Caldwell, Robert P. Griffiths, John D. Lattin, Rick G. Kelsey, Timothy D. Schowalter, Elaine R. Ingham and James W. Kimbrough. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Plant and Soil, Systematic Botany, Caldasia and Brittonia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact