Steve Salloway

1.9k citations
16 papers · 851 · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Salloway

16 papers receiving 795 citations

Steve Salloway's Hit Papers

Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations 2025 · 39 citations
390Years since publication102030

Peers

Steve Salloway
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 335
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 187
  • Neurology 127
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
Replace John R. Absher with:
John R. Absher United States
Carolina Garrett Portugal
Aaron McMurtray United States
G. E. Berrios United Kingdom
Greg Whelan Australia
Steven Paul Woods United States
Leonardo Caixeta Brazil
Stefan Gutwinski Germany
Nick Wainwright United Kingdom
Heather Bentley United States
Steve Salloway relative to John R. Absher United States John R. Absher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
John R. Absher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Salloway

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Salloway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Salloway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Salloway more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Salloway

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Salloway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Salloway. The network helps show where Steve Salloway may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Salloway, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Salloway Line = papers co-authored together Steve Salloway links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1991220
2 1997219
3 1997116
4 1996104
5
Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations
Hit paper breakdown →
202539
6 202138
7 201532
8 199422
9 200418
10 200210
11 20199
12 19978
13 19926
14 20235
15 19963
16 19932

About Steve Salloway

Steve Salloway is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Galectins and Cancer Biology (1 paper) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (335 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (187 citations), Neurology (127 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations). Steve Salloway has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Cummings, Paul Malloy, Michael S. Mega, Carol J. Farran, Carolyn S. Wilken, Jeffrey L. Cummings, L A Kurjanczyk, Jeong E. Nam Shin, G. O. Aspinall and Leonard A. Mermel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuropsychiatry, The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Infection and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact