Steve McFee

405 citations
34 papers · 310 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Steve McFee

29 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Steve McFee
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 30
  • Computational Mechanics 116
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 186
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 34
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 65
Replace E. M. Buturla with:
E. M. Buturla United States
Christoph Pflaum Germany
Piotr Sypek Poland
Din-Kow Sun United States
Jianyong Xie United States
Giuseppe Borzi Italy
Heinz K. Dirks Germany
J.-F. Lee United States
Iván González Spain
Dilip Kumar Gayen India
Steve McFee relative to E. M. Buturla United States E. M. Buturla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
E. M. Buturla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve McFee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve McFee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve McFee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve McFee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve McFee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve McFee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve McFee. The network helps show where Steve McFee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Steve McFee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve McFee Line = papers co-authored together Steve McFee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198854
2 199237
3 199430
4 198726
5 199226
6 199421
7 199619
8 199110
9 19939
10 19938
11 20017
12 19986
13 19996
14 19996
15 20046
16 19905
17 20185
18 19974
19 19994
20 19963

About Steve McFee

Steve McFee is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Hardware and Architecture and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 34 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (22 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (20 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (5 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (3 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers), Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (3 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (2 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (30 citations), Computational Mechanics (116 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (186 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (34 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (65 citations). Steve McFee has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Alister Lowther, J.P. Webb, Dennis D. Giannacopoulos, Francisco D. Galiana, Derek N. Dyck, Donglin Ma, B. Forghani and Qiyang Wu. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Journal of Computational Physics and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact