Steve Hindmarsh
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 5
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing 5
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Martin L. Jones (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Peddie (1 shared paper)Anne Weston (1 shared paper)Luke Nightingale (1 shared paper)Helen Spiers (1 shared paper)Lucy Collinson (1 shared paper)Chris Lintott (1 shared paper)Joost de Folter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet (5 papers)Wellcome Open Research (2 papers)Traffic (1 paper)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Epilepsy & Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Steve Hindmarsh
11 papers receiving 820 citations
Steve Hindmarsh's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Infectious Diseases 658
- Modeling and Simulation 78
- Health 89
- Structural Biology 12
- Animal Science and Zoology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Steve Hindmarsh
This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Hindmarsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Hindmarsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Hindmarsh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Hindmarsh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Hindmarsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Hindmarsh. The network helps show where Steve Hindmarsh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Steve Hindmarsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neutralising antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by BNT162b2 vaccination Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 391 |
| 2 | 2020 | 155 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 91 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 7 |
About Steve Hindmarsh
Steve Hindmarsh is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Structural Biology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Modeling and Simulation and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (658 citations), Modeling and Simulation (78 citations), Health (89 citations), Structural Biology (12 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (70 citations). Steve Hindmarsh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin L. Jones, Christopher J. Peddie, Anne Weston, Luke Nightingale, Helen Spiers, Lucy Collinson, Chris Lintott, Joost de Folter, R. Hutchings and Amy Strange. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Wellcome Open Research, Traffic, Nature Biotechnology and Epilepsy & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.