Steve Canham

532 citations
21 papers · 328 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Canham

17 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Steve Canham
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Health Information Management 62
  • Information Systems 160
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 31
  • Information Systems and Management 26
Replace Mihaela Matei with:
Mihaela Matei France
Irene Schlünder Germany
Sinan Wu United States
A. T. McCray United States
Daniel R. Shanahan United Kingdom
Angelica Neisa Canada
Arun Bhatt India
Simona Carini United States
Julia Isaeva Norway
Meredith Nahm United States
Steve Canham relative to Mihaela Matei France Mihaela Matei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×22×
Mihaela Matei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Canham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Canham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Canham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Canham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Canham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Canham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Canham. The network helps show where Steve Canham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Canham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Canham Line = papers co-authored together Steve Canham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017130
2 201159
3 201934
4 201426
5 201615
6 202415
7 201810
8 20138
9 20158
10 20175
11 20154
12 20224
13 20223
14 20202
15 20232
16 20221
17 20241
18 20261
19 20180
20 20200

About Steve Canham

Steve Canham is a scholar working on Information Systems, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Informatics and Information Systems and Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (19 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (6 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (62 citations), Information Systems (160 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (31 citations) and Information Systems and Management (26 citations). Steve Canham has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Christian Ohmann, Wolfgang Kuchinke, Rita Banzi, Jacques Demotes‐Mainard, Karmela Krleža-Jerić, François Gueyffier, Michael Wittenberg, Jens L. Lauritsen, Carmen Schade‐Brittinger and Ferràn Torres. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, F1000Research, Nature Communications, BMJ Open and Data Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact