Steve Bent

502 citations
14 papers · 404 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
    • Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
    • Herbal Medicine Research Studies
  • Pharmacology top 10%
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
    • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Papers in

Steve Bent

14 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Steve Bent
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 125
  • Pharmacology 46
  • Biochemistry 22
  • Pharmacology 54
  • Plant Science 130
Replace Xiaochuan Ye with:
Xiaochuan Ye China
Mehmet Cengiz Üstüner Türkiye
Ayodele O. Soladoye Nigeria
Djanggan Sargowo Indonesia
Dawn Costa United States
Annie George Malaysia
Jonah Sydney Aprioku Nigeria
Azam Alavinezhad Iran
Seung Il Jeong South Korea
Shaina Tanguay-Colucci United States
Steve Bent relative to Xiaochuan Ye China Xiaochuan Ye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Xiaochuan Ye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Bent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Bent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Bent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Bent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Bent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Bent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Bent. The network helps show where Steve Bent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Bent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Bent Line = papers co-authored together Steve Bent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200398
2 200866
3 200663
4 200752
5
An evidence-based review of the 10 most commonly used herbs.
199951
6 200921
7 200214
8 200611
9 200210
10 20026
11 20025
12 20075
13 20021
14 20021

About Steve Bent

Steve Bent is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pharmacology, Biomaterials, Complementary and alternative medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 14 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (2 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (2 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers) and Phytoestrogen effects and research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (125 citations), Pharmacology (46 citations), Biochemistry (22 citations), Pharmacology (54 citations) and Plant Science (130 citations). Steve Bent has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ethan Basch, Catherine Ulbricht, Chris Del Mar, Ivo Foppa, Paul Hammerness, Heather Boon, Philippe Szapary, Wendy Weissner, Mamta Vora and Edzard Ernst. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatics, Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy, Journal of Dietary Supplements and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact