Stephen Winder
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Papers in
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 5
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- H R Atta (2 shared papers)Shonagh Walker (1 shared paper)P Gilligan (6 shared papers)Vinay Gupta (2 shared papers)Inderpal Singh (2 shared papers)Patrick O’Kelly (3 shared papers)M. Sokal (1 shared paper)Frank Murray (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Eye (3 papers)Emergency Medicine Journal (3 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (1 paper)European Journal of Emergency Medicine (1 paper)Retina (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandBrazil
In The Last Decade
Stephen Winder
17 papers receiving 242 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Ophthalmology 79
- Emergency Medicine 73
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 4
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
- Oral Surgery 11
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Winder
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Winder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Winder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Winder. The network helps show where Stephen Winder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Winder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 7 | Why are we waiting? A study of the patients' perspectives about their protracted stays in an emergency department. | 2008 | 14 |
| 8 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 15 | The Transit/Admission Lounge study. | 2009 | 3 |
| 16 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2 |
About Stephen Winder
Stephen Winder is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (79 citations), Emergency Medicine (73 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (4 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations) and Oral Surgery (11 citations). Stephen Winder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include H R Atta, Shonagh Walker, P Gilligan, Vinay Gupta, Inderpal Singh, Patrick O’Kelly, M. Sokal, Frank Murray, Michael Quirke and Gavin C. Harewood. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Emergency Medicine Journal, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, European Journal of Emergency Medicine and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.