Stephen Winder

514 citations
17 papers · 236 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
    • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
    • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes

Papers in

Stephen Winder

17 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Stephen Winder
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 96
  • Emergency Medicine 86
  • Oral Surgery 13
  • Economics and Econometrics 46
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace James Sharpe with:
James Sharpe United States
A Scorza Italy
Sumbal Janjua United States
Luísa Fonseca Portugal
Loka Thangamathesvaran United States
Ernie Shippey United States
LeRoy Riddick United States
Miguel Ángel Castro Spain
Rám N. Sukhai Netherlands
Ka Siu Fan United Kingdom
Stephen Winder relative to James Sharpe United States James Sharpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
James Sharpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Winder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Winder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Winder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Winder. The network helps show where Stephen Winder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Winder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Winder Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Winder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199953
2 200838
3 200920
4 200819
5 199414
6
Why are we waiting? A study of the patients' perspectives about their protracted stays in an emergency department.
200814
7 201013
8 199612
9 201011
10 199511
11 20067
12 20107
13 20115
14 20194
15
The Transit/Admission Lounge study.
20093
16 20193
17 20062

About Stephen Winder

Stephen Winder is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (96 citations), Emergency Medicine (86 citations), Oral Surgery (13 citations), Economics and Econometrics (46 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). Stephen Winder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include H R Atta, P Gilligan, Shonagh Walker, Inderpal Singh, Vinay Gupta, Patrick O’Kelly, M. Sokal, Gavin C. Harewood, Frank Murray and H. Humphreys. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Journal, Eye, Ophthalmology Retina, European Journal of Emergency Medicine and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact