Stephen Smith

472 citations
7 papers · 53 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Soft tissue tumor case studies
    • Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
    • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases

Papers in

  • Law 2
    • Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
    • Criminal Law and Evidence 1
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 1

Stephen Smith

5 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers

Stephen Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Rheumatology 16
  • Neurology 16
  • Animal Science and Zoology 10
  • Infectious Diseases 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 21
Replace Koos P J van Dam with:
Koos P J van Dam Netherlands
Davide Rozza Italy
Gabriele Gallina Italy
José Presas Argentina
Mohsen Farrokhpour Iran
Alessio Signori Italy
Kathryn O’Shea United Kingdom
D. Rouzaud France
Charlotte Borocco France
Teruaki Murakami Japan
Stephen Smith relative to Koos P J van Dam Netherlands Koos P J van Dam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Koos P J van Dam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Smith. The network helps show where Stephen Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 199029
2 202214
3 20095
4 19873
5 20202
6
Due Process and the Subpoena Power in Federal Environmental, Health, and Safety Whistleblower Proceedings
19980
7 20220

About Stephen Smith

Stephen Smith is a scholar working on Law, Infectious Diseases, Strategy and Management, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (1 paper), Animal Virus Infections Studies (1 paper), Criminal Law and Evidence (1 paper), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (1 paper) and Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (16 citations), Neurology (16 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (10 citations), Infectious Diseases (14 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (21 citations). Stephen Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Smith, B.A. Gusterson, Christopher D.�M. Fletcher, David Wield, Melissa Kennedy, Thomas Masi, Chunlei Su, Richard W. Gerhold, Michelle M. Dennis and Stephen A. Kania. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Information Management, Journal of Virology, Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, Faculty publications and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact