David Wield

102 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

David Wield
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 516
  • Development 130
  • Business and International Management 36
  • Strategy and Management 418
  • Economics and Econometrics 498
Replace Esben Sloth Andersen with:
Esben Sloth Andersen Denmark
Susana Borrás Denmark
Ingo Liefner Germany
François Chesnais France
Aurora A.C. Teixeira Portugal
Luis Rubalcaba Spain
Wilfred A. Dolfsma Netherlands
Vivien Walsh United Kingdom
Steven C. Michael United States
Rosalinde J.A. Klein Woolthuis Netherlands
David Wield relative to Esben Sloth Andersen Denmark Esben Sloth Andersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Esben Sloth Andersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wield. The network helps show where David Wield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Wield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wield Line = papers co-authored together David Wield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993330
2 1994296
3 1992178
4 200080
5 200463
6 200963
7 200556
8 199748
9 200047
10 199044
11 200641
12 201041
13 199636
14
Implementing New Technologies
198535
15 201334
16 200033
17
High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space
199129
18 200529
19
Industrialization and development
199228
20 200228

About David Wield

David Wield is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Development, Information Systems and Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biotechnology and Related Fields (20 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (18 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (17 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (13 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (10 papers), Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America (8 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers) and Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (516 citations), Development (130 citations), Business and International Management (36 citations), Strategy and Management (418 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (498 citations). David Wield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Doreen Massey, Paul Quintas, Ernest Braun, Joanna Chataway, Martin F. Kenney, Les Levidow, Susan Carr, Joyce Tait, Robin Roy and Dinar Kale. Their work appears in journals such as Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Science and Public Policy, Journal of International Development, Research Policy and Technovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact