Stephen Read

688 citations
12 papers · 260 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Read

11 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Stephen Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Clinical Psychology 99
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 110
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 46
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 65
  • Speech and Hearing 11
Replace Caroline Mohr with:
Caroline Mohr Australia
Geoff Marston United Kingdom
Leila Vaezazizi Switzerland
Satheesh Gangadharan United Kingdom
JoAnne Bielecki United States
Anna M. Palucka Canada
Deborah M. Spitalnik United States
Colin Hemmings United Kingdom
S. Cooray United Kingdom
Even Myrbakk Norway
Stephen Read relative to Caroline Mohr Australia Caroline Mohr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Caroline Mohr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Read. The network helps show where Stephen Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Read Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2006117
2 200550
3 201626
4 200313
5 200713
6 199811
7 20089
8 20066
9 20065
10 20045
11 19975
12 20080

About Stephen Read

Stephen Read is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (99 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (110 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (46 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations) and Speech and Hearing (11 citations). Stephen Read has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Simon Whitaker, Ilse Van Hove, Mariëlle Eerdekens, Lilian Thorpe, Tammi Walker, Mark F. Naylor, Leigh A. Thorpe, Matthew Lindley, Angela Hassiotis and André Strydom. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, European Journal of Human Genetics, Psychopharmacology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact