Stephen Prah

39 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Stephen Prah
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Horticulture 15
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98
  • Business and International Management 19
  • Soil Science 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 62
Replace Kwasi Ohene-Yankyera with:
Kwasi Ohene-Yankyera Ghana
David Boansi Ghana
Kwadwo Asenso-Okyere United States
A.S. Bamire Nigeria
Fred Nimoh Ghana
Abraham Falola Nigeria
Alfred R. Bizoza Rwanda
Zainab Oyetunde‐Usman United Kingdom
Kwabena Nyarko Addai United States
Omphile Temoso Australia
Stephen Prah relative to Kwasi Ohene-Yankyera Ghana Kwasi Ohene-Yankyera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Kwasi Ohene-Yankyera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Prah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Prah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Prah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Prah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Prah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Prah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Prah. The network helps show where Stephen Prah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Prah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Prah Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Prah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202437
2 202320
3 202418
4 202216
5 202314
6 202410
7 20239
8 20239
9 20238
10 20238
11 20237
12 20247
13 20246
14 20246
15 20235
16 20245
17 20235
18 20234
19 20253
20 20233

About Stephen Prah

Stephen Prah is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science, Plant Science and Horticulture, having authored 46 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (22 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (17 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (12 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (5 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers) and Economic Growth and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (15 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (98 citations), Business and International Management (19 citations), Soil Science (64 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (62 citations). Stephen Prah has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, United States and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Bright Owusu Asante, Omphile Temoso, Wanglin Ma, Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa, John N. Ng’ombe, Robert Aidoo, Fred Nimoh, James Osei Mensah, Kwabena Nyarko Addai and Dadson Awunyo‐Vitor. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Development Economics, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Sustainability and British Food Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact